Uploaded image for project: 'Qt'
  1. Qt
  2. QTBUG-104113

Modernize comparisons: can we provide macros?

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Task Task
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Icon: P2: Important P2: Important
    • None
    • None
    • Core: Other
    • None

      See epic for more information.

      We're asking all maintainers to execute the following programme:

      For each pair of types that are comparable:

      • add a private compare as a back-end for <=> that can be out-of-line (cf. QTBUG-100276)
      • a classification (incl. user docs! (QTBUG-104110)) into exactly one of
        • strong
        • partial
        • weak
      • add tests for all relational operators (QTBUG-104108)
      • all traditional relational operators (==, !=, <, >, <=, >=) that work in C++20 (incl. synthesized ones) should also work in C++17.

      Explore how much of this we can hide behind macros, and define such macros.

        For Gerrit Dashboard: QTBUG-104113
        # Subject Branch Project Status CR V

            cnn Qt Core & Network
            mmutz Marc Mutz
            Vladimir Minenko Vladimir Minenko
            Alex Blasche Alex Blasche
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated: